- In RNA-seq gene expression data analysis, we come across various expression units such as RPM, RPKM, FPKM, TPM, TMM, DESeq, SCnorm, GeTMM, ComBat-Seq and raw reads counts.
- The expression units provide a digital measure of the abundance of gene or transcripts.
- Most of the times it’s difficult to understand the basic underlying methodology to calculate these units from mapped sequence data.
- I have seen a lot of posts of such normalization questions and their confusion among readers. Hence, I attempted here to explain these units in a much simpler way (avoided complex mathematical expressions).
Why different normalized expression units?
- Normalized expression units are necessary to remove technical biases in sequenced data such as depth of sequencing and gene length, and make gene expressions directly comparable within and across samples. This is because more sequencing depth produces more read count for a gene expressed at the same level and differences in gene length generate unequal reads count for genes expressed at the same level (longer the gene more the read count).
- Normalized expression units help to remove batch effects.
Gene expression units and calculation
RPM or CPM (Reads per million mapped reads or Counts per million mapped reads)
For example, You have sequenced one library with 5 million(M) reads. Among them, total 4 M matched to the genome sequence and 5000 reads matched to a given gene.
- RPM does not consider the transcript length normalization.
- RPM Suitable for sequencing protocols where reads are generated irrespective of gene length
from bioinfokit.analys import norm, get_data # load sugarcane RNA-seq expression dataset (Published in Bedre et al., 2019) df = get_data('sc_exp').data df.head(2) gene ctr1 ctr2 ctr3 trt1 trt2 trt3 length 0 Sobic.001G000200 338 324 246 291 202 168 1982.0 1 Sobic.001G000400 49 21 53 16 16 11 4769.0 # as this data has gene length column, we will drop length column df = df.drop(['length'], axis=1) # make gene column as index column df = df.set_index('gene') df.head(2) ctr1 ctr2 ctr3 trt1 trt2 trt3 gene Sobic.001G000200 338 324 246 291 202 168 Sobic.001G000400 49 21 53 16 16 11 # now, normalize raw counts using CPM method nm = norm() nm.cpm(df=df) # get CPM normalized dataframe cpm_df = nm.cpm_norm cpm_df.head(2) ctr1 ctr2 ctr3 trt1 trt2 trt3 gene Sobic.001G000200 100.695004 101.731189 74.721094 92.633828 74.270713 95.314714 Sobic.001G000400 14.597796 6.593688 16.098447 5.093269 5.882829 6.240844
RPKM (Reads per kilo base of transcript per million mapped reads)
RPKM (reads per kilobase of transcript per million reads mapped) is a gene expression unit that measures the expression levels (mRNA abundance) of genes or transcripts. RPKM is a gene length normalized expression unit that is used for identifying the differentially expressed genes by comparing the RPKM values between different experimental conditions. Generally, the higher the RPKM of a gene, the higher the expression of that gene.
RPKM calculation formula,
Here, 103 normalizes for gene length and 106 for sequencing depth factor.
FPKM (Fragments per kilo base of transcript per million mapped fragments) is a gene expression unit which is analogous to RPKM. FPKM is used especially for normalizing counts for paired-end RNA-seq data in which two (left and right) reads are sequenced from the same DNA fragment. Generally, the higher the FPKM of a gene, the higher the expression of that gene.
When we map paired-end data, both reads or only one read with high quality from a fragment can map to reference sequence. To avoid confusion or multiple counting, the fragments to which both or single read mapped are counted and represented for FPKM calculation.
RPKM calculation example,
You have sequenced one library with 5 M reads. Among them, total 4 M matched to the genome sequence and 5000 reads matched to a given gene with a length of 2000 bp.
- RPKM considers the gene length for normalization
- RPKM is suitable for sequencing protocols where reads sequencing depends on gene length
- Used in single-end RNA-seq experiments (FPKM for paired-end RNA-seq data)
RPKM/FPKM does not represent the accurate measure of relative RNA molar concentration (rmc) and can be biased towards identifying the differentially expressed genes as the total normalized counts for each sample will be different 3,4. TPM is proposed as an alternative to the RPKM.
from bioinfokit.analys import norm, get_data # load sugarcane RNA-seq expression dataset (Published in Bedre et al., 2019) df = get_data('sc_exp').data df.head(2) # output gene ctr1 ctr2 ctr3 trt1 trt2 trt3 length 0 Sobic.001G000200 338 324 246 291 202 168 1982.0 1 Sobic.001G000400 49 21 53 16 16 11 4769.0 # make gene column as index column df = df.set_index('gene') df.head(2) # output ctr1 ctr2 ctr3 trt1 trt2 trt3 length gene Sobic.001G000200 338 324 246 291 202 168 1982.0 Sobic.001G000400 49 21 53 16 16 11 4769.0 # now, normalize raw counts using RPKM method # gene length must be in bp nm = norm() nm.rpkm(df=df, gl='length') # get RPKM normalized dataframe rpkm_df = nm.rpkm_norm rpkm_df.head(2) # output ctr1 ctr2 ctr3 trt1 trt2 trt3 gene Sobic.001G000200 50.804745 51.327542 37.699846 46.737552 37.472610 48.090169 Sobic.001G000400 3.060976 1.382614 3.375644 1.067995 1.233556 1.308627
TPM (Transcripts per million)
- TPM considers the gene length for normalization
- TPM is suitable for sequencing protocols where reads sequencing depends on gene length
TPM is proposed as an alternative to RPKM because of inaccuracy in RPKM measurement. In contrast to RPKM, the TPM average is constant and is proportional to the relative RNA molar concentration (rmc) 3,4.
from bioinfokit.analys import norm, get_data # load sugarcane RNA-seq expression dataset (Published in Bedre et al., 2019) df = get_data('sc_exp').data df.head(2) # output gene ctr1 ctr2 ctr3 trt1 trt2 trt3 length 0 Sobic.001G000200 338 324 246 291 202 168 1982.0 1 Sobic.001G000400 49 21 53 16 16 11 4769.0 # make gene column as index column df = df.set_index('gene') # output ctr1 ctr2 ctr3 trt1 trt2 trt3 length gene Sobic.001G000200 338 324 246 291 202 168 1982.0 Sobic.001G000400 49 21 53 16 16 11 4769.0 # now, normalize raw counts using TPM method # gene length must be in bp nm = norm() nm.tpm(df=df, gl='length') # get TPM normalized dataframe tpm_df = nm.tpm_norm tpm_df.head(2) # output ctr1 ctr2 ctr3 trt1 trt2 trt3 gene Sobic.001G000200 99.730156 97.641941 72.361658 89.606265 69.447237 90.643338 Sobic.001G000400 6.008723 2.630189 6.479263 2.047584 2.286125 2.466582
TMM (Trimmed Mean of M-values)
- TMM is a between-sample normalization method in contrast to within-sample normalization methods (RPM, RPKM/FPKM, or TPM)
- TMM normalization method assumes that most of the genes are not differentially expressed
- TMM normalize the total RNA output among the samples and does not consider gene length or library size for normalization
- TMM considers sample RNA population and effective in normalization of samples with diverse RNA repertoires (e.g. samples from different tissues). TMM will be good choice to remove the batch effects while comparing the samples from different tissues or genotypes or in cases where RNA population would be significantly different among the samples.
- To calculate TMM,
- get the library size normalized read count for each gene in each sample
- calculate the log2 fold change between the two samples (M value)
- get absolute expression count (A value)
- Now, double trim the upper and lower percentages of the data (trim M values by 30% and A values by 5%)
- Get weighted mean of M after trimming and calculate normalization factor ( see Robinson et al., 2010 for details)
- TMM is implemented in edgeR and performs better for between-samples comparisons
- edgeR does not consider gene length for normalization as it assumes that the gene length would be constant between the samples
TMM normalization calculation using edgeR,
# load library > library(edgeR) > x <- read.csv("https://reneshbedre.github.io/assets/posts/gexp/df_sc.csv",row.names="gene") # delete last column (gene length column) > x <- x[,-7] > head(x) ctr1 ctr2 ctr3 trt1 trt2 trt3 Sobic.001G000200 338 324 246 291 202 168 Sobic.001G000400 49 21 53 16 16 11 Sobic.001G000700 39 49 30 46 52 25 Sobic.001G000800 530 530 499 499 386 264 Sobic.001G001000 12 3 4 3 10 7 Sobic.001G001132 4 2 2 3 4 1 > group <- factor(c('c','c', 'c', 't', 't', 't')) > y <- DGEList(counts=x, group=group) # normalize for library size by cacluating scaling factor using TMM (default method) > y <- calcNormFactors(y) # normalization factors for each library > y$samples group lib.size norm.factors ctr1 c 3357347 1.0290290 ctr2 c 3185467 0.9918449 ctr3 c 3292872 1.0479952 trt1 t 3141934 0.9651681 trt2 t 2720231 0.9819187 trt3 t 1762881 0.9864858 # count per million read (normalized count) > norm_counts <- cpm(y) > head(norm_counts) ctr1 ctr2 ctr3 trt1 trt2 trt3 Sobic.001G000200 97.860339 102.5561297 71.3023988 95.9799323 75.634827 96.6223700 Sobic.001G000400 14.186854 6.6471566 15.3618989 5.2772471 5.990877 6.3264647 Sobic.001G000700 11.291578 15.5100320 8.6954145 15.1720855 19.470352 14.3783289 Sobic.001G000800 153.449643 167.7615701 144.6337277 164.5841451 144.529917 151.8351528 Sobic.001G001000 3.474332 0.9495938 1.1593886 0.9894838 3.744298 4.0259321 Sobic.001G001132 1.158111 0.6330625 0.5796943 0.9894838 1.497719 0.5751332
DESeq or DESeq2 normalization (median-of-ratios method)
- The DESeq (and also DESeq2) normalization method is proposed by Anders and Huber, 2010 and is similar to TMM
- DESeq normalization method also assumes that most of the genes are not differentially expressed
- The DESeq calculates size factors for each sample to compare the counts obtained from different samples with different sequencing depth
- DESeq normalization uses the median of the ratios of observed counts to calculate size factors.
- Briefly, the size factor is calculated by first dividing the observed counts for each sample by its geometric mean.
- The size factor is then calculated as the median of this ratio for each sample.
- This size factor then used for normalizing raw count data for each sample.
- DESeq or DESeq2 does not consider gene length for normalization as it assumes that the gene length would be constant between the samples.
- DESeq or DESeq2 performs better for between-samples comparisons
DESeq2 normalization calculation,
Note: DESeq2 requires raw counts (not normalized) as integer values for differential expression analysis. If you have expected counts from RSEM, it is recommended to use tximport to import the counts and then to use DESeqDataSetFromTximport() for performing differential expression analysis using DESeq2. In addition, you can also round the expected counts from RSEM but it does not offer the benefits of tximport such as normalization of transcript lengths per gene for gene-level expression analysis 13.
# load library > library(DESeq2) > x <- read.csv("https://reneshbedre.github.io/assets/posts/gexp/df_sc.csv",row.names="gene") > cond <- read.csv("https://reneshbedre.github.io/assets/posts/gexp/condition.csv",row.names="sample") > cond$condition <- factor(cond$condition) # keep only required columns present in the sample information table > x <- x[, rownames(cond)] > head(x) ctr1 ctr2 ctr3 trt1 trt2 trt3 Sobic.001G000200 338 324 246 291 202 168 Sobic.001G000400 49 21 53 16 16 11 Sobic.001G000700 39 49 30 46 52 25 Sobic.001G000800 530 530 499 499 386 264 Sobic.001G001000 12 3 4 3 10 7 Sobic.001G001132 4 2 2 3 4 1 # get dds > dds <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData = x, colData = cond, design = ~ condition) > dds <- estimateSizeFactors(dds) # DESeq2 normalization counts > y = counts(dds, normalized = TRUE) > head(y) ctr1 ctr2 ctr3 trt1 trt2 Sobic.001G000200 272.483741 290.412982 199.133348 272.915069 211.917896 Sobic.001G000400 39.502081 18.823064 42.902713 15.005640 16.785576 Sobic.001G000700 31.440432 43.920482 24.284555 43.141214 54.553122 Sobic.001G000800 427.267404 475.058273 403.933092 467.988384 404.952020 Sobic.001G001000 9.673979 2.689009 3.237941 2.813557 10.490985 Sobic.001G001132 3.224660 1.792673 1.618970 2.813557 4.196394 trt3 Sobic.001G000200 271.037655 Sobic.001G000400 17.746513 Sobic.001G000700 40.332984 Sobic.001G000800 425.916314 Sobic.001G001000 11.293236 Sobic.001G001132 1.613319 # get size factors > sizeFactors(dds) ctr1 ctr2 ctr3 trt1 trt2 trt3 1.2404410 1.1156526 1.2353531 1.0662658 0.9531993 0.6198401
SCnorm for single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq)
- The normalization units explained above works best for bulk RNA-seq and could be biased for scRNA-seq due to abundance of zero expression counts, variable count-depth relationship (dependence of gene expression on sequencing depth), and other unwanted technical variations
- Bacher et al., 2017 proposed a SCnorm, a robust and accurate between-sample normalization unit for scRNA-seq
- Steps involved in SCnorm normalization;
- SCnorm requires the estimates of expression counts, which can be obtained from RSEM, featureCounts or HTSeq
- Genes with low expression counts are filtered out (keep the genes with atleast 10 non-zero expression counts)
- estimate the count-depth relationship using quantile regression
- Cluster genes into groups with similar count-depth relationship
- A scale factor is calculated from each group and used for estimation for normalized expression
- SCnorm is implemented in R package and is available on Bioconductor
- Zhang et al., 2020 proposed a ComBat-Seq (batch effect adjustment method) approach to addresses the large variance of batch effects present in RNA-seq count data
- The benefit of ComBat-Seq is that it adjusts the batch effects (technical variations in the samples such as differences in sequencing instrument for processing samples or differences in reagents or different persons performing the experiments) for raw counts data and provide the output as integer counts in contrast to other normalization methods which can produce fraction count values as described above (e.g. RPKM, TPM, TMM)
- The resulting batch adjusted integer counts can be directly used with DESeq2 which accepts only integer count data for differential gene expression analysis
- ComBat-Seq takes input as a raw un-normalized data (e.g. obtained from featureCounts or HTSeq) as input and
addresses the batch effects using a negative binomial regression model. As ComBat-Seq uses edgeR, the expected counts from RSEM can also work, but raw un-normalized counts are preferred by edgeR.
- Briefly, ComBat-Seq adjust the count data by comparing the quantiles of the empirical distributions of data to the expected distribution without batch effects in the data
- ComBat-Seq is available in R
- Smid et al., 2018 proposed a GeTMM (Gene length corrected TMM) which works better for both between-samples and within-sample gene expression analysis
- GeTMM is based on the TMM normalization but allows the gene length correction which lacks in TMM and DESeq or DESeq2
- In GeTMM, calculate RPK for each gene from raw read count data which is then corrected by TMM normalization factor and scaled to per million reads (See Smid et al., 2018 for detailed calculation)
GeTMM normalization using edgeR,
# load library > library(edgeR) > x <- read.csv("https://reneshbedre.github.io/assets/posts/gexp/df_sc.csv",row.names="gene") # calculate reads per Kbp of gene length (corrected for gene length) # gene length is in bp in exppression dataset and converted to Kbp > rpk <- ( (x[,1:6]*10^3 )/x[,7]) # comparing groups > group <- factor(c('c','c', 'c', 't', 't', 't')) > y <- DGEList(counts=rpk, group=group) # normalize for library size by cacluating scaling factor using TMM (default method) > y <- calcNormFactors(y) # normalization factors for each library > y$samples group lib.size norm.factors ctr1 c 1709962.4 1.0768821 ctr2 c 1674190.8 0.9843634 ctr3 c 1715232.3 1.0496310 trt1 t 1638517.0 0.9841989 trt2 t 1467549.5 0.9432728 trt3 t 935125.2 0.9680985 # count per million read (normalized count) > norm_counts <- cpm(y) > head(norm_counts) ctr1 ctr2 ctr3 trt1 trt2 trt3 Sobic.001G000200 92.610097 99.192986 68.940090 91.044874 73.623702 93.630285 Sobic.001G000400 5.579741 2.671970 6.172896 2.080457 2.423609 2.547863 Sobic.001G000700 19.324103 27.128459 15.203763 26.026360 34.273836 25.196497 Sobic.001G000800 74.410581 83.143635 71.656315 79.998205 72.089293 75.392505 Sobic.001G001000 9.283023 2.593127 3.164924 2.650027 10.290413 11.014674 Sobic.001G001132 7.464699 4.170389 3.817485 6.392849 9.929718 3.795926
Enhance your skills with courses on genomics and bioinformatics
- Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nature methods. 2008 Jul 1;5(7):621-8.
- Wagner GP, Kin K, Lynch VJ. Measurement of mRNA abundance using RNA-seq data: RPKM measure is inconsistent among samples. Theory in biosciences. 2012 Dec 1;131(4):281-5.
- Bullard JH, Purdom E, Hansen KD, Dudoit S. Evaluation of statistical methods for normalization and differential expression in mRNA-Seq experiments. BMC bioinformatics. 2010 Dec;11(1):94.
- Zhao S, Ye Z, Stanton R. Misuse of RPKM or TPM normalization when comparing across samples and sequencing protocols. Rna. 2020 Aug 1;26(8):903-9.
- Robinson MD, Oshlack A. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome biology. 2010 Mar;11(3):R25.
- Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Nature Precedings. 2010 Apr 30:1-.
- Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome biology. 2014 Dec 1;15(12):550.
- Bacher R, Chu LF, Leng N, Gasch AP, Thomson JA, Stewart RM, Newton M, Kendziorski C. SCnorm: robust normalization of single-cell RNA-seq data. Nature methods. 2017 Jun;14(6):584.
- Zhang Y, Parmigiani G, Johnson WE. ComBat-Seq: batch effect adjustment for RNA-Seq count data. bioRxiv. 2020 Jan 1.
- Smid M, van den Braak RR, van de Werken HJ, van Riet J, van Galen A, de Weerd V, van der Vlugt-Daane M, Bril SI, Lalmahomed ZS, Kloosterman WP, Wilting SM. Gene length corrected trimmed mean of M-values (GeTMM) processing of RNA-seq data performs similarly in intersample analyses while improving intrasample comparisons. BMC bioinformatics. 2018 Dec;19(1):1-3.
- Bedre R, Irigoyen S, Schaker PD, Monteiro-Vitorello CB, Da Silva JA, Mandadi KK. Genome-wide alternative splicing landscapes modulated by biotrophic sugarcane smut pathogen. Scientific reports. 2019 Jun 20;9(1):1-2.
- Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 1;26(1):139-40.
- Soneson C, Love MI, Robinson MD. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. F1000Research. 2015;4.
If you have any questions, comments, corrections, or recommendations, please email me at email@example.com
If you enhanced your knowledge and practical skills from this article, consider supporting me on
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Some of the links on this page may be affiliate links, which means we may get an affiliate commission on a valid purchase. The retailer will pay the commission at no additional cost to you.